Difference between revisions of "Zildjian Scimitar 14" Hi-Hat"
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
'''Size:''' 14 Inch<br> | '''Size:''' 14 Inch<br> | ||
'''Series:''' [[Zildjian Scimitar#Scimitar|Scimitar]]<br> | '''Series:''' [[Zildjian Scimitar#Scimitar|Scimitar]]<br> | ||
| + | ::Top: 988g / Bottom: 1388g<br> | ||
'''Weight:''' Top: 1000g / Bottom: 1412g<br> | '''Weight:''' Top: 1000g / Bottom: 1412g<br> | ||
'''Years of production:''' 1986 - 1997<br> | '''Years of production:''' 1986 - 1997<br> | ||
Revision as of 13:10, 7 September 2024
Group: Hi-Hats
Type: Hi-Hat
Size: 14 Inch
Series: Scimitar
- Top: 988g / Bottom: 1388g
- Top: 988g / Bottom: 1388g
Weight: Top: 1000g / Bottom: 1412g
Years of production: 1986 - 1997
Sound file: Scimitar 14" Hi-Hat
Zildjian's Description: <<< - >>>
Review: "The Hi-Hats especially benefited from the extra weight of the bottom cymbal which added a degree of "clunk" to the closed sound and greatly assisted the projection. In some ways I was a little disappointed with these Hi-Hats. They weren't as responsive as I would have liked and the "chip" when bringing them together with the foot left a little to be desired in terms of focus. Possibly I expected too much from them merely because they sported the Zildjian name. Nevertheless they were definitely a very useful pair of Hi-Hats with a fair amount of character and volume even though they aren't the brightest cymbals in the world. Mind you for £60 all complaints take on a very different perspective — as does the word Zildjian emblazoned across their surface."
Review written by Simon Braund ("Zildjian Scimitar Cymbals", Phaze 1, July 1989)
Artist/song where it can be heard: