Difference between revisions of "Sabian HH 16" Thin Chinese"

From Cymbal
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "__NOEDITSECTION__ <div style="float:right">__TOC__</div> thumb|right|450px '''Group:''' Chinese<br> '''...")
 
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
<div style="float:right">__TOC__</div>
 
<div style="float:right">__TOC__</div>
 
[[File:Sabian_HH_16_Thin_Chinese_1.png|thumb|right|450px]]
 
[[File:Sabian_HH_16_Thin_Chinese_1.png|thumb|right|450px]]
'''Group:''' [[Sabian Cymbal Type#Chinese|Chinese]]<br>
+
'''Group:''' [[Sabian Types and Models#Chinas|Chinas]]<br>
 
'''Type:''' [[Sabian Thin Chinese|Thin Chinese]]<br>
 
'''Type:''' [[Sabian Thin Chinese|Thin Chinese]]<br>
 
'''Size:''' 16 Inch<br>
 
'''Size:''' 16 Inch<br>
 
'''Series:''' [[Sabian HH#HH|HH]]<br>
 
'''Series:''' [[Sabian HH#HH|HH]]<br>
'''Weight:''' 798g<br>
+
'''Weight:''' 798g, 855g<br>
 
'''Years of production:'''  1991 - ?<br>
 
'''Years of production:'''  1991 - ?<br>
'''Sound file:''' unknown <br>
+
'''Sound file:''' [https://youtu.be/UbDiNgHTwbE?si=neoYouxVhktq0TAK HH 16" Thin Chinese]  <br>
 
'''Sabian's Description:''' [[Sabian Thin Chinese#HH|<<< - >>>]]<br>
 
'''Sabian's Description:''' [[Sabian Thin Chinese#HH|<<< - >>>]]<br>
 
'''Review''': "The  16" and 16" Brilliant models sound great for quick, explosive crashes. They sounded low-pitched for their size, and worked best when mounted right-side up. (Their decay was even quicker when they were mounted upside down.) In these smaller models (along with the 18" models) I really liked the Brilliant cymbals because they weren't as harsh-sounding (in the ultra-highs) as the non-Brilliants, and they had a little more sustain. However, if you're in a loud band and you need a China that really cuts through and is quick, I'd recommend the regular, non-Brilliant models."  <br>
 
'''Review''': "The  16" and 16" Brilliant models sound great for quick, explosive crashes. They sounded low-pitched for their size, and worked best when mounted right-side up. (Their decay was even quicker when they were mounted upside down.) In these smaller models (along with the 18" models) I really liked the Brilliant cymbals because they weren't as harsh-sounding (in the ultra-highs) as the non-Brilliants, and they had a little more sustain. However, if you're in a loud band and you need a China that really cuts through and is quick, I'd recommend the regular, non-Brilliant models."  <br>
Review written by William F. Miller ("Product Close-Up", Modern Drummer, September 1991, p. 40)<br>
+
 
 +
:Review written by William F. Miller ("Product Close-Up", Modern Drummer, September 1991, p. 40)<br>
 +
 
 
'''Artist/song where it can be heard:'''
 
'''Artist/song where it can be heard:'''

Latest revision as of 00:26, 13 October 2025

Sabian HH 16 Thin Chinese 1.png

Group: Chinas
Type: Thin Chinese
Size: 16 Inch
Series: HH
Weight: 798g, 855g
Years of production: 1991 - ?
Sound file: HH 16" Thin Chinese
Sabian's Description: <<< - >>>
Review: "The 16" and 16" Brilliant models sound great for quick, explosive crashes. They sounded low-pitched for their size, and worked best when mounted right-side up. (Their decay was even quicker when they were mounted upside down.) In these smaller models (along with the 18" models) I really liked the Brilliant cymbals because they weren't as harsh-sounding (in the ultra-highs) as the non-Brilliants, and they had a little more sustain. However, if you're in a loud band and you need a China that really cuts through and is quick, I'd recommend the regular, non-Brilliant models."

Review written by William F. Miller ("Product Close-Up", Modern Drummer, September 1991, p. 40)

Artist/song where it can be heard: