Difference between revisions of "Sabian HH 16" Thin Chinese"
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
'''Size:''' 16 Inch<br> | '''Size:''' 16 Inch<br> | ||
'''Series:''' [[Sabian HH#HH|HH]]<br> | '''Series:''' [[Sabian HH#HH|HH]]<br> | ||
| − | '''Weight:''' 798g<br> | + | '''Weight:''' 798g, 855g<br> |
'''Years of production:''' 1991 - ?<br> | '''Years of production:''' 1991 - ?<br> | ||
| − | '''Sound file:''' | + | '''Sound file:''' [https://youtu.be/UbDiNgHTwbE?si=neoYouxVhktq0TAK HH 16" Thin Chinese] <br> |
'''Sabian's Description:''' [[Sabian Thin Chinese#HH|<<< - >>>]]<br> | '''Sabian's Description:''' [[Sabian Thin Chinese#HH|<<< - >>>]]<br> | ||
'''Review''': "The 16" and 16" Brilliant models sound great for quick, explosive crashes. They sounded low-pitched for their size, and worked best when mounted right-side up. (Their decay was even quicker when they were mounted upside down.) In these smaller models (along with the 18" models) I really liked the Brilliant cymbals because they weren't as harsh-sounding (in the ultra-highs) as the non-Brilliants, and they had a little more sustain. However, if you're in a loud band and you need a China that really cuts through and is quick, I'd recommend the regular, non-Brilliant models." <br> | '''Review''': "The 16" and 16" Brilliant models sound great for quick, explosive crashes. They sounded low-pitched for their size, and worked best when mounted right-side up. (Their decay was even quicker when they were mounted upside down.) In these smaller models (along with the 18" models) I really liked the Brilliant cymbals because they weren't as harsh-sounding (in the ultra-highs) as the non-Brilliants, and they had a little more sustain. However, if you're in a loud band and you need a China that really cuts through and is quick, I'd recommend the regular, non-Brilliant models." <br> | ||
Revision as of 12:05, 1 September 2024
Group: Chinese
Type: Thin Chinese
Size: 16 Inch
Series: HH
Weight: 798g, 855g
Years of production: 1991 - ?
Sound file: HH 16" Thin Chinese
Sabian's Description: <<< - >>>
Review: "The 16" and 16" Brilliant models sound great for quick, explosive crashes. They sounded low-pitched for their size, and worked best when mounted right-side up. (Their decay was even quicker when they were mounted upside down.) In these smaller models (along with the 18" models) I really liked the Brilliant cymbals because they weren't as harsh-sounding (in the ultra-highs) as the non-Brilliants, and they had a little more sustain. However, if you're in a loud band and you need a China that really cuts through and is quick, I'd recommend the regular, non-Brilliant models."
Review written by William F. Miller ("Product Close-Up", Modern Drummer, September 1991, p. 40)
Artist/song where it can be heard:
